COMMON INTEREST PRIVILEGE ENFORCED
PACER & e-COURTS: ACTIVE
FundMyCases Emblem
FundMyCasesLitigation Finance
Compliance/Common Interest Doctrine
Privilege & Work-Product Preservation

Common Interest Doctrine & Work-Product Protection

Maintaining absolute evidentiary privilege when sharing litigation assessments, damage models, and trial strategy with prospective funding syndicates is critical. FundMyCases enforces tripartite common-interest agreements grounded in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(3).

Tripartite Privilege Protocol

Prior to accessing any case dossier or entering a Virtual Data Room (VDR), capital allocators and underwriters execute a tripartite Common Interest Agreement establishing:

  • A unified legal and commercial interest in prevailing in the litigation.
  • Express classification of all disclosures as protected attorney work product under FRCP 26(b)(3).
  • Mutual confidentiality covenants prohibiting dissemination or use outside deal underwriting.
  • Mandatory joint defense and immediate notification in the event of an adversary discovery subpoena.

Controlling Judicial Precedents

Federal and state courts overwhelmingly hold that disclosing trial materials to litigation funders under confidentiality and common interest does not waive core work-product protection:

Devon IT, Inc. v. IBM Corp. (E.D. Pa. 2012)

Held that communications and case valuations shared with litigation financiers under an NDA are protected work product and not discoverable by opposing counsel.

Miller UK Ltd. v. Caterpillar, Inc. (N.D. Ill. 2014)

Ruled that funding deal terms and attorney evaluations are protected from disclosure under Federal Rule 26(b)(3).

Technical Safeguards

Zero-Knowledge Hardware-Gated VDR Enforcement

Privilege preservation is reinforced by FundMyCases’ technical architecture. Documents uploaded to the VDR cannot be downloaded in unencrypted plaintext, are rendered with forensic canvas watermarks, and require session-scoped cryptographic authentication keys.